|
Nanotechnology
- UK falling behind learning curve
BRIEFLY
Denmark’s Carlsberg
Breweries is to take a 51% share of Serbian brewery Pivara Celarevo in a
private placement and will also make a public offer for the outstanding
shares in a deal valuing the company at 53m euros. Pivara Celarevo is the
third largest brewery in Serbia with a capacity of 1.3m hl. In 2002,
Pivara Celarevo had a turnover of 23m euros, an operating profit 5.6m
euros and sold 780,000 hl beer, giving it a 15% market share.
German chemicals company BASF
is to end its relationship with DSM for feed enzymes, but will continue to
pursue the market for itself.
US-based oilseed firm Bunge’s
Indian subsidiary, Gee Pee Ceval Proteins and Investment, has bought the
India-based assets of Prestige Foods Limited. The assets acquired include
an oilseed processing unit with an integrated vegetable oil refinery and
packaging facility and production capacity of 150 tons per day of refined
oil and 100 tons per day of vanaspati, a butter substitute used in India.
This acquisition is part of Bunge's continuing expansion in the Indian
oilseed processing market. In
August it bought Hindustan Lever's edible oils business.
Nanotechnology
UK falling behind learning curve
Manufacturing’s contribution to
the UK’s GDP has shrunk from 21% in 1997 to 17% today, reports the
UK’s Confederation of British Industry (CBI). This means it is losing
ground against other industrialised nations, but its greatest threat is
likely to come from China and India, says CBI leader Digby Jones.
The British Design Council also
castigates British managers for not adopting leading edge technologies
such as nanotechnology. Writing in its latest bulletin, the council says a
recent survey by the Institution of Electronic Engineers in 2002, only 27%
of businesses thought that nanotechnology showed more potential for
innovation than microelectronics and IT.
“Forget 'grey goo' and evil,
self-replicating robots,” it says. “The real danger from
nanotechnology will be the failure of UK businesses to realise its
potential. And it's not just money that's needed, but a new way of
commercialising the products.”
The UK Department of Trade and
Industry reckons the global market for nanotechnology products could reach
GBP700bn by 2010. But several chief executives the council spoke to are
not optimistic about how of that will come to the UK. Kevin Matthews, CEO
of nanoparticle manufacturer Oxonica, says “We have the skills base, the
research base and the infrastructure but when it comes to customers for
the technology we're lagging behind Germany, Japan and the US.”
He blames the innate
conservativeness of the supply chains, a view echoed by Malcolm Wilkinson,
managing director of technology consultancy Technology for Industry.
“Many companies are not aware of the disruptive effect these
technologies could have on their businesses in the very near future.”
Tim Harper, CEO of nanotechnology
consultancy Cientifica points to the impact of IT on the US economy and
military capability. “Nanotechnology is an even more fundamental
technology than IT. Not only does it have the ability to shift the balance
of military power but also affect the global balance of power in the
energy markets,” he claims.
Harper reckons over half the
European nanotechnology businesses are based in Germany because the
plastics and chemicals industries are so established there. But the rest
come to the UK because of the availability of venture capital money.
But the council’s business
development manager Ellie Runcie reckons the nanotech start-ups don’t
often check market demand. “What a research unit needs is a hot
intellectual property process and the application of design. Rather than
using all its resources on building a business it should get money from
licensing and use design techniques to find the right markets for its
intellectual property.”
But that is likely to perpetuate
the pattern whereby the British create but do not exploit their
intellectual property. A new booklet published by the CBI shows the
government has made the manufacturing situation worse because of the
build-up of regulation, increases in business taxation and failure to
improve transport. This leads to low levels of investment and discourages
firms from developing the high-value products and processes that command
premium prices in global markets, it says. The CBI report recommends firms
to invest in technology, capital stock, R & D, innovation, marketing,
skills and design. It also calls on the government to step up support for
R&D, to encourage job creation and to help exporters.
Euro view
Meanwhile, the European
Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), set up to coordinate basic
research of benefit to EU members, shows a drop in the value of contracts
signed for paid research. Earnings went from 34.8m euros in 2001 to 21.3m
euros in 2002. This was the result of the Fifth Framework Programme
ending, it says. However, the JRC’s budget was steady at 250m euros.
The Sixth Framework Programme,
which started earlier this year, has a budget of 16.27bn euros over five
years. Moreover, the EC’s research commissioner Philippe Busquin is
trying hard to persuade governments to raise R&D spending to 3% of GDP
to compete with the US and Japan, both of which spend more. Given that the
euro area may move into full-blown recession and the present impasse over
various trade issues, this seems unlikely in the short term.
Sixth
framework programme for RTD and demonstration activities
|
1. Focusing and integrating Community research
|
13
345
|
|
Thematic priorities
(1)
|
|
11
285
|
|
|
• Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health
|
2
255
|
|
|
|
Advanced genomics and its applications for health
|
1
100
|
|
|
|
Combating major diseases
|
1
155
|
|
|
|
• Information society technologies (2)
|
3
625
|
|
|
|
• Nanotechnologies and nanosciences, knowledge-based
multifunctional materials and new production processes and devices
|
1
300
|
|
|
|
• Aeronautics and space
|
1
075
|
|
|
|
• Food quality and safety
|
685
|
|
|
|
• Sustainable development, global change and ecosystems
|
2
120
|
|
|
|
Sustainable energy systems
|
810
|
|
|
|
Sustainable surface transport
|
610
|
|
|
|
Global change and ecosystems
|
700
|
|
|
|
• Citizens and governance in a knowledge-based society
|
225
|
|
|
|
Specific activities covering a wider field of research
|
|
1
300
|
|
|
• Policy support and anticipating scientific and
technological needs
|
555
|
|
|
|
• Horizontal research activities involving SMEs
|
430
|
|
|
|
• Specific measures in support of international cooperation
|
315
|
|
|
|
Non-nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
2. Structuring the European Research Area
|
2
605
|
|
Research and innovation
|
290
|
|
|
|
Human resources and mobility
|
1
580
|
|
|
|
Research infrastructures (3)
|
655
|
|
|
|
Science and society
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Strengthening the foundations of the European
Research Area
|
320
|
|
Support for the coordination of activities
|
270
|
|
|
|
Support for the coherent development of policies
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
16
270
|
|
(1)
Including 285 million € for international co-operation.
(2) Including up to 100 million for
further development of Géant and GRID.
(3) Including up to 200 million for
further development of Géant and GRID.
|
|